On 11.04.20 21:47, Corey Huinker wrote:
Term 'relation': A sequence is internally a table with one row - right?
Shall we extend the list of concrete relations by 'sequence'? Or is this
not necessary because 'table' is already there?
I wrote one for sequence, it was a bit math-y for Alvaro's taste, so we're going to try again.
This seems to be a misunderstanding. My question was whether we shall extend the definition of Relation to: "... Tables, views, foreign tables, materialized views, indexes, and *sequences* are all relations."
Kind regards, Jürgen
