Re: [HACKERS] Copyright in partition.h and partition.c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Copyright in partition.h and partition.c
Date
Msg-id a4f8c0c0-e931-6d03-758f-52f400122e05@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] Copyright in partition.h and partition.c  (Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Copyright in partition.h and partition.c  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2017/09/05 15:48, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> Here is the copyright in partition.h:
> 
>  * Copyright (c) 2007-2017, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
> 
> I think it's reasonable that that matches the copyright in partition.c,
> but partition.c has:
> 
>  * Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2017, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
>  * Portions Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California
> 
> Is that intentional?

No, it's unintentional.  The difference may have resulted from copying
different files to become partition.h and partition.c, respectively.

Maybe, we should change both to say 2016-2017?

I don't know the exact rule for how we determine those years.  Is there
some rule in place about that?  When I look at execParallel.c, which
supposedly got introduced into the tree recently, I see 1996-2017.  OTOH,
the files in contrib/bloom all have 2016-2017.

Thanks,
Amit




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pgbench: Skipping the creating primary keys afterinitialization
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pgbench: Skipping the creating primary keys after initialization