Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Infrastructure TODO list - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Greg Sabino Mullane
Subject Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Infrastructure TODO list
Date
Msg-id a40e3abcfe6bd99426f89f090c7acc1c@biglumber.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Infrastructure TODO list  ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>)
List pgsql-www
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


> As someone else pointed out (was it Tom?), all the
> uninformed debating here just slows things down.

Huh? How can putting a new website in place possibly move
any slower than it has? I first complained about specific
problems with the website over two years ago! The answer always
seems to be "well, we have a new version that is about to go
in place any day now" I'm also not sure why debate needs to
be perceived as a bad thing - this is an open-source project, and
one would hope that applies to the whole project: DNS, web site,
mailing lists, etc.

> Now much as I like a good debate, can we please at least stop
> going over old ground

That's the problem, isn't it - this is old ground. That's why Bruce
raised the thread in the fiest place - after all these years, we
still seem to be spinning our wheels. Problems with the site tend to
be a) not noticed right away, and b) fixed slowly if at all. People
reporting problems or offering suggestions are often met with
hostility and rudeness. The -www list was a secret and exclusive
club (although it is better now).

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200409300734

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFBW+/PvJuQZxSWSsgRAgavAJ0V0y0rw8srOrx1ZapsZdJro9bLPwCfeT/5
OdG95I9y1mwyFH/ZDFR+Rok=
=j3Vb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: Justin Clift
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Infrastructure TODO list
Next
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Infrastructure TODO list