[HACKERS] separate serial_schedule useful? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject [HACKERS] separate serial_schedule useful?
Date
Msg-id a37e9c57-22d4-1b82-1270-4501cd2e984e@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [HACKERS] separate serial_schedule useful?
List pgsql-hackers
I noticed that the test "hash_func" was listed in parallel_schedule but
not in serial_schedule.  I have seen that a few times recently where a
patch proposes to add a new test file but forgets to add it to the
serial_schedule.

I wonder whether it's still useful to keep two separate test lists.  I
think we could just replace make installcheck with what make
installcheck-parallel MAX_CONNECTIONS=1 does.  Thoughts?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nico Williams
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] separate serial_schedule useful?