Re: [PATCH] DefaultACLs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nikhil Sontakke
Subject Re: [PATCH] DefaultACLs
Date
Msg-id a301bfd90907222355q53cfee8fo1001a3fae5359023@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] DefaultACLs  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

>
>> Anyway, while this patch might not necessary get commited in this commit
>> fest, I'd still like to have opinion from one of the commiters on "the VIEW
>> problem" which also affects grant on all patch ( see
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-07/msg00957.php ) and I
>> fear "returned with feedback" might prevent that until next commit fest.
>
> OK, hopefully one of them will chime in with an opinion.  As I say, I
> would like to see this get committed if it's done, I just wasn't sure
> it was.  But now it seems that was due to insufficiently careful
> reading of the thread, with the exception of this issue and the need
> to finish the docs.
>

IMO, the committers should have a go at the "GRANT ON ALL" (simpler
than DefaultACLs) patch first. Whatever consensus is arrived for the
VIEW issue as part of its review can then spill over to the
DefaultACLs patch too.

As mentioned by Petr, he does not seem to be in a hurry to get the
DefaultACLs patch in, in this commitfest..

Regards,
Nikhils
--
http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: Extension Facility
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows