> On 5/29/07, Luke Lonergan <llonergan@greenplum.com> wrote: >> AFAIK you can't RAID1 more than two drives, so the above doesn't make >> sense >> to me. > > Yeah, I've never seen a way to RAID-1 more than 2 drives either. It > would have to be his first one: > > D1 + D2 = MD0 (RAID 1) > D3 + D4 = MD1 ... > D5 + D6 = MD2 ... > MD0 + MD1 + MD2 = MDF (RAID 0) >
I don't know what the failure mode ends up being, but on linux I had no problems creating what appears to be a massively redundant (but small) array
Good point, also if you had Raid 1 with 3 drives with some bit errors at least you can take a vote on whats right. Where as if you only have 2 and they disagree how do you know which is right other than pick one and hope... But whatever it will be slower to keep in sync on a heavy write system.