Re: Postgres slower than MS ACCESS - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Peter Childs
Subject Re: Postgres slower than MS ACCESS
Date
Msg-id a2de01dd0602160532y37de192dv@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Postgres slower than MS ACCESS  ("Jay Greenfield" <jag@timberline.ca>)
List pgsql-performance


On 15/02/06, Jay Greenfield <jag@timberline.ca> wrote:

I've been vacuuming between each test run.

Not vacuuming results in times all the way up to 121 minutes.  For a direct
comparison with Access, the vacuuming time with Postgres should really be
included as this is not required with Access.


Hmm but then you would have to include Access Vacuum too I'll think you will find "Tools -> Database Utils -> Compact Database" preforms a simular purpose and is just as important as I've seen many Access Databases bloat in my time.

Peter Childs

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Ron
Date:
Subject: Re: qsort again (was Re: Strange Create Index
Next
From: Ron
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] qsort again