Re: Make error messages about WAL segment size more consistent - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Make error messages about WAL segment size more consistent
Date
Msg-id a27be1ad-dc89-65d8-d3d1-8e90ab90675b@eisentraut.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Make error messages about WAL segment size more consistent  (Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 22.08.23 16:26, Aleksander Alekseev wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> 
>> This started out as a small patch to make pg_controldata use the logging
>> API instead of printf statements, and then it became a larger patch to
>> adjust error and warning messages about invalid WAL segment sizes
>> (IsValidWalSegSize()) across the board.
> 
> Thanks for working on this.
> 
>> I went through and made the
>> primary messages more compact and made the detail messages uniform.  In
>> initdb.c and pg_resetwal.c, I use the newish option_parse_int() to
>> simplify some of the option parsing.  For the backend GUC
>> wal_segment_size, I added a GUC check hook to do the verification
>> instead of coding it in bootstrap.c.  This might be overkill, but that
>> way the check is in the right place and it becomes more self-documenting.
> 
> I reviewed the code and tested it on Linux and MacOS with Autotools
> and Meson. The patch LGTM.

Thanks, committed.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: persist logical slots to disk during shutdown checkpoint
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning