Re: [HACKERS] Preliminary results for proposed new pgindentimplementation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Preliminary results for proposed new pgindentimplementation
Date
Msg-id a268e9f0-0493-7f51-3042-a0f780712783@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Preliminary results for proposed new pgindent implementation  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Preliminary results for proposed new pgindent implementation  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 5/19/17 11:22, Tom Lane wrote:
> I certainly would rather that our version matched something that's under
> active maintenance someplace.  But it seems like there are two good
> arguments for having a copy in our tree:

Is pgindent going to be indented by pgindent?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Preliminary results for proposed new pgindentimplementation
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] BUG #14657: Server process segmentationfault in v10, May 10th dev snapshot