On 2023-08-19 23:01, Sehrope Sarkuni wrote:
> If there are "official" channels (e.g. like the IRC ones) then sure.
> Otherwise it should be noted as being unofficial community channels run
> by
> third parties. Maybe grouping all such things under one place with a
> common, "Third party community sites..." heading.
Sure. Sounds like a good idea. At some point we'll probably want to
figure out a process for unofficial Community channel becoming
"official"
ones (if they care to). :)
> FYI, the Slack link on the mailing list site goes to
> https://postgres-slack.herokuapp.com/ but it's a 404.
>
> It was probably running on the Heroku free tier and stopped when they
> shut
> down their free tier at the end of last year.
Ahhh. Old link then. I checked my records, and old server address
I used to use for it was:
https://postgresteam.slack.com
Trying that now bounces me here though:
https://app.slack.com/client/T0FS7GCKS/C0FS3UTAP
There still seem to be people actively using it. Quite a lot of them
actually, from scanning through their many channels there. 20k+ members
for some of the channels.
> Adding Denish to this thread as the earliest mention I could find of
> that
> link in the mailing lists was from him.
Good thinking. Sounds like we'll need an updated Slack "invite" link or
something at the very least. And probably need to add it to the other
template as well, so it shows up on the Community pages (etc). :)
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
