Re: New horology failure - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Manfred Koizar
Subject Re: New horology failure
Date
Msg-id a174b01d22nhjb04qi22mth8cep834k6na@email.aon.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to New horology failure  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
[resending...]


On Sun, 23 May 2004 11:38:51 +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne
<chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> wrote:
>I get this since Tom's commit.

>--- ./results/horology.out      Sun May 23 11:39:49 2004
>***************
>*** 1787,1796 ****
>!      | Sat Sep 22 18:19:20 2001 PDT | @ 34 years                    | Fri Sep 22 18:19:20 1967 PDT
>[...]
>--- 1787,1796 ----
>!      | Sat Sep 22 18:19:20 2001 PDT | @ 34 years                    | Fri Sep 22 18:19:20 1967 PST
>[...]

I got the same with snapshot-20040521 yesterday [i.e. 2004-05-22]
afternoon when I ran make check.  But only once.  make installcheck
passed all tests, and the failure didn't reappear when I tried make
check again.

I just got the failure again with make check after having configured
with a new install directory.  My guess is that horology needs some
datafile from the install location.

ServusManfred


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Manfred Koizar
Date:
Subject: Re: zero-column table behavior
Next
From: "Ismail Kizir"
Date:
Subject: Optimizer bug??