Re: [HACKERS] 6.1 jumbo patch? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Martin
Subject Re: [HACKERS] 6.1 jumbo patch?
Date
Msg-id a124df4c0927f19d2fb7b4365d536c4c
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] 6.1 jumbo patch?  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
>
> With the 6.1 release two weeks old, and no one really adding any new
> feature, is it a good idea to think about creating a 6.1 patch in the
> next week or so to add some fixes?
>
> I have the ownership preservation code installed, there could be an
> endian-communication patch, a datetime patch, and perhaps some others.
>
> What do people think?  We could just diff the current tree against the
> 6.1 release?
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian
> maillist@candle.pha.pa.us
>

Definitely a good idea. There do seem to be quite a few little
problems that have come up.


Andrew

- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Andrew C.R. Martin                             University College London
EMAIL: (Work) martin@biochem.ucl.ac.uk    (Home) andrew@stagleys.demon.co.uk
URL:   http://www.biochem.ucl.ac.uk/~martin
Tel:   (Work) +44(0)171 419 3890                    (Home) +44(0)1372 275775

------------------------------

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Useful addition for psql?
Next
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] TR: Problems with Large Objects !!