Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: [SenderAddress Forgery]Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: [SenderAddress Forgery]Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Date
Msg-id a0890481-4ceb-a6bb-7180-9f156176c2d0@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: [HACKERS]path toward faster partition pruning  (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
David,

On 2018/01/12 12:30, David Rowley wrote:
> Can you also perform a self-review of the patch? Some of the things
> I'm picking up are leftovers from a previous version of the patch. We
> might never get through this review if you keep leaving those around!

Sorry, I will look more closely before posting the next version.  I guess
I may have rushed a bit too much when posting the v18/v19 patches, partly
because it's been 3 weeks since v17 and I felt I needed to catch up
quickly given the activity on the run-time pruning thread which depends on
the patches here.

Thanks,
Amit



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold.
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Enhance pg_stat_wal_receiver view to display connected host