Hi,
On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 09:45:44AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 08:05:10AM +1300, David Rowley wrote:
> > That might be quite good for small lengths or for use cases where the
> > memory is always or almost always zero. The problem is there's no
> > early exit when you find the first non-zero which means, for larger
> > lengths, reading much more memory. That'll both take longer and
> > possibly evict cache lines which might be useful to have in the near
> > future.
>
> Didn't know this one either, thanks for the explanation.
+1, thanks!
Regards,
--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
