Re: per backend I/O statistics - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bertrand Drouvot
Subject Re: per backend I/O statistics
Date
Msg-id ZypXy3fH/EyALaTR@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: per backend I/O statistics  (Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 10:01:50AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> And why not add more per-backend stats in the future? (once the I/O part is done).
> 
> I think that's one more reason to go with option 2 (and implementing a brand new
> PGSTAT_KIND_BACKEND kind).

I'm starting working on option 2, I think it will be easier to discuss with
a patch proposal to look at.

If in the meantime, one strongly disagree with option 2 (means implement a brand
new PGSTAT_KIND_BACKEND and keep PGSTAT_KIND_IO), please let me know.

Regards,

-- 
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Aleksander Alekseev
Date:
Subject: Re: New function normal_rand_array function to contrib/tablefunc.
Next
From: Nikolay Samokhvalov
Date:
Subject: Proposals for EXPLAIN: rename ANALYZE to EXECUTE and extend VERBOSE