Re: relfilenode statistics - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bertrand Drouvot
Subject Re: relfilenode statistics
Date
Msg-id Zym1xlMhuzPdekMt@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: relfilenode statistics  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: relfilenode statistics
Re: relfilenode statistics
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 02:51:10PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 4:27 AM Bertrand Drouvot
> <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Then I think we should go with the "sometimes I don't know the relation OID
> > so I want to use the relfilenumber instead, without changing the user experience"
> > way.
> 
> So does the latest version of the patch implement that principal
> uniformly throughout?

No, please don't look at v6-0001 and 0002 (as mentioned up-thread). The purpose
here is mainly to get an agreement on the design before moving forward.

Does it sound ok to you to move with the above principal? (I'm +1 on it).

Regards,

-- 
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gurjeet Singh
Date:
Subject: Re: doc: pgevent.dll location
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: New "raw" COPY format