Hi,
On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 06:49:04PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 08:52:04AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> > Yeah, but not only the relfilenode ones. All kinds were affected as random data
> > was in the padding bytes for all of them.
>
> A quick test where I add some padding junk in PgStat_HashKey proves
> that you are right.
Thanks for the testing!
> I'm wondering if we should backpatch that,
> actually, down to where it has been introduced. We are unlikely going
> to change this structure,
Yeah.
> but if we do for the sake of a bug fix,
> which is always a possibility as ABI does not matter much for this
> internal structure, that's potentially trouble waiting ahead.
That's right.
> Thoughts?
hm, yeah I think that it could fall into the "low-risk fixes" category [0] and
that we can opt for backpatch.
[0]: https://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning/
Regards,
--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
