Hi,
On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 12:40:05PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 02:06:11PM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> > Yeah, agree that it would make sense to document in the test what has been
> > discovered here.
>
> How about something like the attached?
Thanks!
A few comments:
1 === Nit
s/Permutations like this one/Permutations like the following commented out one/ ?
2 ===
s/back its result/back its result once woken up/ ?
3 ===
s/faster than the wait/before the SQL function doing the wait returns its result/ ?
With 2 === and 3 === I think it's easier to "link" both sentences that way.
Thoughts?
Regards,
--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
