Re: Should rolpassword be toastable? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: Should rolpassword be toastable?
Date
Msg-id Zv8MTMy87pRlRqD_@nathan
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should rolpassword be toastable?  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Should rolpassword be toastable?
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Sep 21, 2024 at 03:25:54PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> Thanks for reviewing.  I went ahead and committed 0002 since it seems like
> there's consensus on that one.  I've attached a rebased version of 0001
> with s/characters/bytes.

For the reasons discussed upthread [0], I can't bring myself to add an
arbitrary limit to the password hash length.  I am going to leave 0001
uncommitted for now.

[0] https://postgr.es/m/Zu2eT2H8OT3OXauc%40nathan

-- 
nathan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Make tuple deformation faster
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Should rolpassword be toastable?