Re: Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness
Date
Msg-id Zux_QODFzijk93Pr@nathan
Whole thread Raw
In response to Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 10:03:09AM +0200, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> It looks to me like these cases could be modified to accept only
> ATT_PARTITIONED_TABLE, not ATT_TABLE anymore.  The ATT_TABLE cases are
> useless anyway, because they're rejected by transformPartitionCmd.

+1.  If anything, this makes the error messages more consistent.

-- 
nathan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding skip scan (including MDAM style range skip scan) to nbtree
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #18545: \dt breaks transaction, calling error when executed in SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION