On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 05:35:56PM +0800, Andy Fan wrote:
> Currently detoast_attr always detoast the data into a palloc-ed memory
> and then if user wants the detoast data in a different memory, user has to
> copy them, I'm thinking if we could provide a buf as optional argument for
> detoast_attr to save such wastage.
>
> [...]
>
> What do you think?
My first thought is that this seems reasonable if there are existing places
where we are copying the data out of the palloc'd memory, but otherwise it
might be more of a prerequisite patch for the other things you mentioned.
--
nathan
