On Sat, Aug 10, 2024 at 10:17:27AM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2024 at 04:06:16PM -0400, Corey Huinker wrote:
>>> Furthermore, most of the callbacks should do almost nothing for a given
>>> upgrade, and since pg_upgrade runs on the server, client/server round-trip
>>> time should be pretty low.
>>
>> To my mind, that makes pipelining make more sense, you throw out N queries,
>> most of which are trivial, and by the time you cycle back around and start
>> digesting result sets via callbacks, more of the queries have finished
>> because they were waiting on the query ahead of them in the pipeline, not
>> waiting on a callback to finish consuming its assigned result set and then
>> launching the next task query.
>
> My assumption is that the "waiting for a callback before launching the next
> query" time will typically be pretty short in practice. I could try
> measuring it...
Another option might be to combine all the queries for a task into a single
string and then send that in one PQsendQuery() call. That may be a simpler
way to eliminate the time between queries.
--
nathan
