On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 07:01:38AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> I share the same understanding and I think those can be removed.
>
> The patch LGTM.
That sounds about right. All the volatile references we have here
have been kept under the assumption that a memory barrier is required.
As we hold spin locks in these areas, that should not be necessary
anyway. So LGTM as well.
A quick lookup at the rest of contrib/ is showing me that the
remaining volatile references point at uses with TRY/CATCH blocks,
where we require them.
--
Michael
