Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication
Date
Msg-id ZqAKsCcodzxtcDhA@nathan
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 09:05:05AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> Right, the other option would be to move it to the place where we call
> check_old_cluster_for_valid_slots(), etc. Initially, it was kept in
> the specific function (get_db_rel_and_slot_infos) as we were
> mainlining the count at the per-database level but now as we are
> changing that I am not sure if calling it from the same place is a
> good idea. But OTOH, it is okay to keep it at the place where we
> retrieve the required information from the old cluster.

I moved it to where you suggested.

> One minor point is the comment atop get_subscription_count() still
> refers to the function name as get_db_subscription_count().

Oops, fixed.

-- 
nathan

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Useless toast
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: [18] Policy on IMMUTABLE functions and Unicode updates