On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 11:27:45AM +0200, Joel Jacobson wrote:
> During work in the separate thread [1], I discovered more cases
> where the link in docs wasn't the canonical link [2].
>
> [1] https://postgr.es/m/CAKFQuwYEX9Pj9G0ZHJeWSmSbnqUyGH+FYcW-66eZjfVG4KOjiQ@mail.gmail.com
> [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canonical_link_element
>
> The. below script e.g. doesn't parse SGML, and is broken in some other ways
> also, but probably good enough to suggest changes that can then be manually
> carefully verified.
The 19 links you are updating here avoid redirections in Wikipedia and
the Postgres wiki. It's always a bit of a chicken-and-egg game in
this area, because links always change, still I don't mind the change.
Any opinions from others?
--
Michael