Re: New standby_slot_names GUC in PG 17 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: New standby_slot_names GUC in PG 17
Date
Msg-id Znu0AME1Isc13Ly1@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New standby_slot_names GUC in PG 17  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 11:39:45AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> --- a/doc/src/sgml/release-17.sgml
> +++ b/doc/src/sgml/release-17.sgml
> @@ -1325,7 +1325,7 @@ Author: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
>
>  <!--
>  Author: Amit Kapila <akapila@postgresql.org>
> -2024-03-08 [bf279ddd1] Introduce a new GUC 'standby_slot_names'.
> +2024-03-08 [bf279ddd1] Introduce a new GUC 'synchronized_standby_slots'.
>
> I am not sure if it is a good idea to change release notes in the same
> commit as the code change. I would prefer to do it in a separate
> commit.

The existing commits referenced cannot change, but it's surely OK to
add a reference to the commit doing the rename for this item in the
release notes, and update the release notes to reflect the new GUC
name.  Using two separate commits ensures that the correct reference
about the rename is added to the release notes, so that's the correct
thing to do, IMHO.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: New standby_slot_names GUC in PG 17
Next
From: Bertrand Drouvot
Date:
Subject: Re: New standby_slot_names GUC in PG 17