Re: Non-text mode for pg_dumpall - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: Non-text mode for pg_dumpall
Date
Msg-id ZmcVqPOGjoccIh-i@nathan
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Non-text mode for pg_dumpall  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: Non-text mode for pg_dumpall
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 04:52:06PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 4:14 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> I'm curious why we couldn't also support the "custom" format.
> 
> Or maybe even a combo - a directory of custom format files? Plus that one
> special file being globals? I'd say that's what most use cases I've seen
> would prefer.

Is there a particular advantage to that approach as opposed to just using
"directory" mode for everything?  I know pg_upgrade uses "custom" mode for
each of the databases, so a combo approach would be a closer match to the
existing behavior, but that doesn't strike me as an especially strong
reason to keep doing it that way.

-- 
nathan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: Non-text mode for pg_dumpall
Next
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: Track the amount of time waiting due to cost_delay