Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes
Date
Msg-id ZlAJCNCltdtTQe0Z@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 11:11:10PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 02:27:07PM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> >> I also don't agree these should be left to "Source code" section. I
> >> feel that section is best suited for extension authors who might care
> >> about some internal API change.  I'm talking of stuff that makes some
> >> user queries possibly N times (!) faster. Surely "Source Code" isn't
> >> the place to talk about that?
> 
> > I said a new section "after our 'Source code' section," not in the
> > source code section.
> 
> Surely, if we make this a separate section, it would come before
> 'Source code'?
> 
> I am not sure Bruce that you realize that your disregard for
> performance improvements is shared by nobody.  Arguably,
> performance is 90% of what we do these days, and it's also
> 90% of what users care about.

Please stop saying I don't document performance.  I have already
explained enough which performance items I choose.  Please address my
criteria or suggest new criteria.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  Only you can decide what is important to you.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: speed up a logical replica setup
Next
From: jian he
Date:
Subject: Re: struct RelOptInfo member relid comments