On Sun, May 19, 2024 at 03:18:11PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> * Another reason for things sitting a long time is that they're too
> big to review without an unreasonable amount of effort. We should
> encourage authors to break large patches into smaller stepwise
> refinements. It may seem like that will result in taking forever
> to reach the end goal, but dropping a huge patchset on the community
> isn't going to give speedy results either.
I think it is sometimes hard to incrementally apply patches if the
long-term goal isn't agreed or know to be achievable.
> * Before starting this thread, Robert did a lot of very valuable
> review of some individual patches. I think what prompted him to
> start the thread was the realization that he'd only made a small
> dent in the problem. Maybe we could divide and conquer: get a
> dozen-or-so senior contributors to split up the list of pending
> patches and then look at each one with an eye to what needs to
> happen to move it along (*not* to commit it right away, although
> in some cases maybe that's the thing to do). It'd be great if
> that could happen just before each commitfest, but that's probably
> not practical with the current patch volume. What I'm thinking
> for the moment is to try to make that happen once a year or so.
For me, if someone already knows what the blocker is, it saves me a lot
of time if they can state that somewhere.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Only you can decide what is important to you.
