Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes
Date
Msg-id ZkKww2fu3gv2kcW7@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 05:31:33PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 06:50:54PM +0200, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
> >> There are two commits that I think would benefit from being listed
> >> (but maybe they are already listed and I somehow missed them, or they
> >> are left out on purpose for some reason):
> 
> > I looked at both of these.   In both cases I didn't see why the user
> > would need to know these changes were made:
> 
> I agree that the buffering change is not likely interesting, but
> the fact that you can now control-C out of a psql "\c" command
> is user-visible.  People might have internalized the fact that
> it didn't work, or created complicated workarounds.

Agreed, attached patch applied.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  Only you can decide what is important to you.

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: GUC-ify walsender MAX_SEND_SIZE constant
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Why is citext/regress failing on hamerkop?