Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes
Date
Msg-id ZkK2uqJ-m_2WgLWR@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Responses Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 10:24:39AM -0400, Joe Conway wrote:
> On 5/11/24 09:57, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 May 2024 at 23:31, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > > 
> > > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > > > I looked at both of these.   In both cases I didn't see why the user
> > > > would need to know these changes were made:
> > > 
> > > I agree that the buffering change is not likely interesting, but
> > > the fact that you can now control-C out of a psql "\c" command
> > > is user-visible.  People might have internalized the fact that
> > > it didn't work, or created complicated workarounds.
> > 
> > The buffering change improved performance up to ~40% in some of the
> > benchmarks. The case it improves mostly is COPY of large rows and
> > streaming a base backup. That sounds user-visible enough to me to
> > warrant an entry imho.
> 
> +1

Attached patch applied.


-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  Only you can decide what is important to you.

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Why is citext/regress failing on hamerkop?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes