Re: AIX support - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: AIX support
Date
Msg-id ZivfBKIsOlJdPJiS@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: AIX support  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 01:06:24PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Anyway, getting an access to such compilers to be able to debug issues
> on hosts that take less than 12h to just compile the code would
> certainly help its adoption.  So seeing commitment in the form of
> patches and access to environments would help a lot.  Overall,
> studying that afresh with v18 looks like a good idea, assuming that
> anybody who commits such patches has access to hosts to evaluate them,
> with buildfarm members running on top, of course.

Agreed.  They can't even have buildfarm member for PG 17 since it
doesn't compile anymore, so someone has to go over the reverted patch,
figure out which ones are still valid, and report back.  Trying to add a
port, with possible breakage, during beta seems too risky compared to
the value.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  Only you can decide what is important to you.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Anton Voloshin
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: psql: add an optional execution-count limit to \watch.
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Why don't we support external input/output functions for the composite types