On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 12:20:05AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> It would definitely make sense for a new port to start by getting
> things going with gcc only, and then look at resurrecting xlc
> support.
Sriram mentioned upthread that he was looking at both of them. I'd be
ready to assume that most of the interest is in xlc, not gcc. But I
may be wrong.
Saying that, dividing the effort into more successive steps is
sensible here (didn't consider that previously, you have a good
point).
--
Michael
