On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 08:51:06AM +0700, Ali Akbar wrote:
> Patch for adding check in pg_upgrade.
[...]
On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 11:36:42AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 09:16:35AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > You mean when upgrading from an instance of 9.6 or older as c30f177 is
> > not there, right?
>
> No - while upgrading from v15 to v16. I'm not clear on how we upgraded
> *to* v15 without hitting the issue, nor how the "not null" got
> dropped...
>
> > Anyway, it seems like the patch from [1] has no need to run this check
> > when the old cluster's version is 10 or newer. And perhaps it should
> > mention that this check could be removed from pg_upgrade once v10
> > support is out of scope, in the shape of a comment.
>
> You're still thinking of PRIMARY KEY as the only way to hit this, right?
> But Ali Akbar already pointed out how to reproduce the problem with DROP
> NOT NULL - which still applies to both v16 and v17.
Rebased and amended the forgotten patch.
See also ZiE3NoY6DdvlvFl9@pryzbyj2023 et seq.
