Re: IPC::Run::time[r|out] vs our TAP tests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: IPC::Run::time[r|out] vs our TAP tests
Date
Msg-id ZhCUWcrWrHswyDaA@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: IPC::Run::time[r|out] vs our TAP tests  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 05:18:51PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> What I suggest Michael do with tanager is install the
> OS-version-appropriate version of GNU readline, so that the animal
> will test what ilmari describes as the actually common use-case.

Thanks for the investigations!  It's clear that this version of
libedit is borked.

> (I see that what he did for the moment is add --without-readline.
> Perhaps that's a decent long-term choice too, because I think we
> have rather little coverage of that option except on Windows.)

Yeah, my motivation did not go beyond that so you can blame me for
being lazy.  ;)

Note also the --without-icu on this host that has little coverage, as
well.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jacob Champion
Date:
Subject: Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~?
Next
From: James Coleman
Date:
Subject: Re: Teach predtest about IS [NOT] proofs