On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 12:00:00PM +0300, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
> Hello Alvaro,
>
> 28.03.2024 18:58, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Grumble. I don't like initialization at declare time, so far from the
> > code that depends on the value. But the alternative would have been to
> > assign right where this blocks starts, an additional line. I pushed it
> > like you had it.
>
> I've stumbled upon a test failure caused by the test query added in that
> commit:
> +ERROR: deadlock detected
> +DETAIL: Process 3076180 waits for AccessShareLock on relation 1259 of database 16386; blocked by process 3076181.
> +Process 3076181 waits for AccessShareLock on relation 2601 of database 16386; blocked by process 3076180.
I think means that, although it was cute to use pg_am in the reproducer
given in the problem report, it's not a good choice to use here in the
sql regression tests.
--
Justin
