Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM` - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM`
Date
Msg-id ZgSaAlb0Ij6GEIDV@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM`  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM`
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 06:09:02PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 11:05:55AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 10:43 AM Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl> wrote:
> > > Alright, changed the GUC name to "allow_alter_system" since that seems
> > > to have the most "votes". One other option would be to call it simply
> > > "alter_system", just like "jit" is not called "allow_jit" or
> > > "enable_jit".
> > >
> > > But personally I feel that the "allow_alter_system" is clearer than
> > > plain "alter_system" for the GUC name.
> > 
> > I agree, and have committed your 0001.
> 
> So, I email "Is this really a patch we think we can push into PG 17. I
> am having my doubts," and the patch is applied a few hours after my
> email.  Wow.

Also odd is that I don't see the commit in git master, so now I am
confused.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  Only you can decide what is important to you.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Large block sizes support in Linux
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: Built-in CTYPE provider