Re: IPC::Run::time[r|out] vs our TAP tests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: IPC::Run::time[r|out] vs our TAP tests
Date
Msg-id Zg8yReb2QDdN_Mtz@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to [MASSMAIL]IPC::Run::time[r|out] vs our TAP tests  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: IPC::Run::time[r|out] vs our TAP tests
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 05:24:05PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> The particular thing that started me down this road was wondering
> why we are getting no useful failure details from buildfarm member
> tanager's struggles with the tab-completion test case added by commit
> 927332b95 [1].

Also please note that tanager has been offline from around the 19th of
March to the 3rd of April, explaining the delay in reporting the
failure in this new psql test.  I've switched it back online two days
ago.

Tom, would you like me to test your patch directly on the host?  That
should be pretty quick, even if I've not yet checked if the failure is
reproducible with a manual build, outside the buildfarm scripts.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: LogwrtResult contended spinlock
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: IPC::Run::time[r|out] vs our TAP tests