Re: UUID v7 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: UUID v7
Date
Msg-id Ze_21IrevF5Nro-g@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: UUID v7  ("Andrey M. Borodin" <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>)
Responses Re: UUID v7
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 11:10:37AM +0500, Andrey M. Borodin wrote:
> On 12 Mar 2024, at 10:53, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>> On 22 Jan 2024, at 09:22, Nikolay Samokhvalov <nik@postgres.ai> wrote:
>>
>> And many libraries are already including implementation of UUIDv7 – here are some examples:
>>
>> - https://www.npmjs.com/package/uuidv7
>> - https://crates.io/crates/uuidv7
>> - https://github.com/google/uuid/pull/139
>
> So at least reviewing patch and agreeing on chosen methods and constants makes sense.

Sure, there is no problem in discussing a patch to implement a
behavior.  But I disagree about taking a risk in merging something
that could become non-compliant with the approved RFC, if the draft is
approved at the end, of course.  This just strikes me as a bad idea.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bertrand Drouvot
Date:
Subject: Re: Spurious pgstat_drop_replslot() call
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Streaming I/O, vectored I/O (WIP)