Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 03:38:59PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 9:13 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 11:35 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> >
> > > Also, adding wait sounds
> > > more like a boolean. So, I don't see the proposed names any better
> > > than the current one.
> > >
> >
> > Anyway, the point is that the current GUC name 'standby_slot_names' is
> > not ideal IMO because it doesn't have enough meaning by itself -- e.g.
> > you have to read the accompanying comment or documentation to have any
> > idea of its purpose.
> >
> 
> Yeah, one has to read the description but that is true for other
> parameters like "temp_tablespaces". I don't have any better ideas but
> open to suggestions.

What about "non_lagging_standby_slots"?

Regards,

-- 
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com