Re: Regardign RecentFlushPtr in WalSndWaitForWal() - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 05:16:39PM +0530, shveta malik wrote:
> Hi hackers,
> 
> I would like to understand why we have code [1] that retrieves
> RecentFlushPtr in WalSndWaitForWal() outside of the loop. We utilize
> RecentFlushPtr later within the loop, but prior to that, we already
> have [2]. Wouldn't [2] alone be sufficient?
> 
> Just to check the impact, I ran 'make check-world' after removing [1],
> and did not see any issue exposed by the test at-least.
> 
> Any thoughts?
> 
> [1]:
>         /* Get a more recent flush pointer. */
>         if (!RecoveryInProgress())
>                 RecentFlushPtr = GetFlushRecPtr(NULL);
>         else
>                 RecentFlushPtr = GetXLogReplayRecPtr(NULL);
> 
> [2]:
>                 /* Update our idea of the currently flushed position. */
>                 else if (!RecoveryInProgress())
>                         RecentFlushPtr = GetFlushRecPtr(NULL);
>                 else
>                         RecentFlushPtr = GetXLogReplayRecPtr(NULL);
> 

It seems to me that [2] alone could be sufficient.

Regards,

-- 
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com