Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 05:20:35PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 4:59 PM Bertrand Drouvot
> <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> wrote:
> > - 84% of the slotsync.c code is covered, the parts that are not are mainly
> > related to "errors".
> >
> > Worth to try to extend the coverage? (I've in mind 731, 739, 766, 778, 786, 796,
> > 808)
> >
> 
> All these additional line numbers mentioned by you are ERROR paths. I
> think if we want we can easily cover most of those but I am not sure
> if there is a benefit to cover each error path.

Yeah, I think 731, 739 and one among the remaining ones mentioned up-thread should
be enough, thoughts?

Regards,

-- 
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com