Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Use of backup_label not noted in log - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Use of backup_label not noted in log
Date
Msg-id ZbbszLPQ3Vd3A9K6@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Use of backup_label not noted in log  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: Use of backup_label not noted in log
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 12:08:46PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Well, I'm OK with this consensus on 1d35f705e if folks think this is
> useful enough for all the stable branches.

I have done that down to REL_15_STABLE for now as this is able to
apply cleanly there.  Older branches have a lack of information here,
actually, because read_backup_label() does not return the TLI
retrieved from the start WAL segment, so we don't have the whole
package of information.
--
Michael
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: jian he
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL:2011 application time
Next
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: Change COPY ... ON_ERROR ignore to ON_ERROR ignore_row