Re: Add a perl function in Cluster.pm to generate WAL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bertrand Drouvot
Subject Re: Add a perl function in Cluster.pm to generate WAL
Date
Msg-id ZZzZpZTl3g96MjSr@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Add a perl function in Cluster.pm to generate WAL  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 01:59:08PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 08:00:00PM +0300, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
> > Yes, I've added (VERBOSE) and also cut down the test to catch the failure faster.

Thanks Alexander!

> > The difference between a successful and a failed run:
> >         tuples: 1 removed, 15 remain, 0 are dead but not yet removable
> > [...]
> >         tuples: 0 removed, 16 remain, 1 are dead but not yet removable
> 
> Yep, it's clear that the horizon is not stable.

Yeap.

> 
> > With FREEZE, 10 iterations with 20 tests in parallel succeeded for me
> > (while without it, I get failures on iterations 1,2).
> > 
> > [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/b2a1f7d0-7629-72c0-2da7-e9c4e336b010%40gmail.com
> 
> Alexander, does the test gain in stability once you begin using the
> patch posted on [2], mentioned by Bertrand?

Alexander, pleae find attached v3 which is more or less a rebased version of it.

Regards,

-- 
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: verify predefined LWLocks have entries in wait_event_names.txt
Next
From: jian he
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL:2011 application time