Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication
Date
Msg-id ZZT4mFW2SMYVgDCL@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 11:24:50AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> I think the next possible step here is to document how to upgrade the
> logical replication nodes as previously discussed in this thread [1].
> IIRC, there were a few issues with the steps mentioned but if we want
> to document those we can start a separate thread for it as that
> involves both publishers and subscribers.
>
> [1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALDaNm2pe7SoOGtRkrTNsnZPnaaY%2B2iHC40HBYCSLYmyRg0wSw%40mail.gmail.com

Yep.  A second thing is whether it makes sense to have more automated
test coverage when it comes to the interferences between subscribers
and publishers with more complex node structures.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Assorted typo fixes
Next
From: vignesh C
Date:
Subject: Re: speed up a logical replica setup