Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows
Date
Msg-id ZZ9jM4sKhmaxaHDi@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 09:40:12PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> No Windows expert here, but it does seem like the same argument
> applies.

Yeah, I've applied the same restriction for pg_regress to avoid
similar problems as we spawn a postgres process in this case.  I've
tested it and it was not causing issues in my own setup or the CI.

I am wondering if we'd better backpatch all that, TBH.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: A recent message added to pg_upgade
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: heavily contended lwlocks with long wait queues scale badly