Re: Moving forward with TDE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Moving forward with TDE
Date
Msg-id ZYshmKIqP9GR1rzX@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Moving forward with TDE  (Chris Travers <chris.travers@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 06:30:50AM +0000, Chris Travers wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I was re-reading the patches here  and there was one thing I didn't understand.
> 
> There are provisions for a separation of data encryption keys for primary and replica I see, and these share a single
WALkey.
 
> 
> But if I am setting up a replica from the primary, and the primary is already encrypted, then do these forceably
sharethe same data encrypting keys?  Is there a need to have (possibly in a follow-up patch) an ability to decrypt and
re-encryptin pg_basebackup (which would need access to both keys) or is this handled already and I just missed it?
 

Yes, decrypt and re-encrypt in pg_basebackup would be necessary, or in
the actual protocol stream.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  Only you can decide what is important to you.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Statistics Import and Export
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Two small bugs in guc.c