Re: Question about non-blocking mode in libpq - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Question about non-blocking mode in libpq
Date
Msg-id ZUFuyJtiEXRQE8zi@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Question about non-blocking mode in libpq  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Question about non-blocking mode in libpq  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 01:58:34PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > I modified your patch, attached, that I would like to apply to all
> > supported versions.
> 
> This seems to have lost the information about what to do if these
> functions fail.  I think probably the only possible failure cause
> in nonblock mode is "unable to enlarge the buffer because OOM",
> but that's certainly not the same thing as "cannot fail".

Okay, I added "_successful_ calls", attached.  I am not sure what else
to add.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  Only you can decide what is important to you.

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Matthias van de Meent
Date:
Subject: btree: implement dynamic prefix truncation (was: Improving btree performance through specializing by key shape, take 2)
Next
From: David Christensen
Date:
Subject: Re: Moving forward with TDE [PATCH v3]