Re: Partial aggregates pushdown - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Partial aggregates pushdown
Date
Msg-id ZTspKdU1sZ4qKLD8@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: Partial aggregates pushdown  ("Fujii.Yuki@df.MitsubishiElectric.co.jp" <Fujii.Yuki@df.MitsubishiElectric.co.jp>)
Responses RE: Partial aggregates pushdown
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 02:44:42AM +0000, Fujii.Yuki@df.MitsubishiElectric.co.jp wrote:
> Hi Momjian.
> 
> Thank you for your improvement.
> As a matter of detail, I think that the areas marked below are erroneous.
> 
> --
> +   Pushdown causes aggregate function cals to send partial aggregate
>                                          ^
> +   function calls to the remote server. If the partial aggregate
> +   function doesn't doesn't exist on the remote server, it causes
>                      ^^^^^^^
> --

Agreed.  Do you want to fix that on your vesion?  I don't have any more
improvements to make.

> > What else needs to be done before committers start to review
> > this?
> There are no others. May I make a new version of v31 with your
> suggested improvements for the committer's review?

Yes, please.  I think the updated docs will help people understand how
the patch works.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  Only you can decide what is important to you.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Document parameter count limit
Next
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node