Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication
Date
Msg-id ZToXrkW1wAfVWOrk@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 05:32:52PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> Such a use case is possible to achieve even without this patch.
> Sawada-San has already given an alternative to slightly tweak the
> steps mentioned by Julien to achieve it. Also, there are other ways to
> achieve it by slightly changing the steps. OTOH, it will create a
> problem for normal logical replication set up after upgrade as
> discused.

So, now that 29d0a77fa6 has been applied to the tree, would it be time
to brush up what's been discussed on this thread for subscribers?  I'm
OK to spend time on it.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Is this a problem in GenericXLogFinish()?
Next
From: Jelte Fennema
Date:
Subject: Re: libpq async connection and multiple hosts